Robert Muller investigates Cambridge Analytica and possible involvement with Russiagate
The head of the Special Counsel investigation of Russian interference in 2016 United States elections, Robert Muller, wants
to clarify the links between Donald Trump’s presidential campaign and Cambridge
Analytica. The American media are reporting that Muller’s assistants are investigating
President Trump’s payment of 6 million dollars to the British firm. It also
seems certain that at some point there have been contacts between Cambridge
Analytica and Russia. Yania Ledovaya teaches at the faculty of Psychology at the
University of St. Petersburg, and she told the online newspaper Meduza that she
had met Alex Kogan, the inventor of the app that collected data from 50 millions Facebook users, in 2013, "by chance". Kogan (from the Russian media
seems to have another surname, Spektor), is of Russian origin, born in Moldova
and lived up to 8 years in Moscow, before moving with his parents to the United
States: "He speaks Russian, but he does not read it and he does not write
it”, says Professor Ledovaya. She also
added: "Now we are called Russian trolls, and it is believed that the roots
of Cambridge Analytica lead to the university where Putin used to study.” Kogan went to Russia simply because he was curious
about his homeland. When in St. Petersburg he was invited by his Russian
colleagues to give lessons regarding the use of social media. He used to say: “I
can find out 100 things about you without even knowing you.” The lessons Kogan delivered were very popular and soon the
state funded them. “We needed foreign professors, and he was young, dynamic, he
dealt with interesting things and he spoke Russian as well” says Ledovaya.
Kogan has worked for two years with his Russian colleagues in St. Petersburg on
social profiling. “Nothing political,” says Ledovaya, “the final aim of those
researches was to understand if from social posts you could identify
psychologically vulnerable people, to whom ads with contactable free service
centres would have been sent." Another main aspect of those researches was to
identify and block the users who showed a negative, narcissistic, manipulative
and psychopathic profile. Ledovaya tells Meduza that the researches are interesting,
but not conclusive, and she expresses professional scepticism towards the
micro targeting advertised by Cambridge Analytica: “I have never seen a research
that confirm the effectiveness of those personalized messages, and my experience
makes me doubt that you just tell an anxious user “Trump will protect you” to
get him up from his home couch and go to vote for him.” The total control of data
is certainly not a novelty in Russian history, and the craft of “polit-tekhnolog”,
already counts two generations of brilliant scholars and manipulators of public
opinion. However, in the electoral campaigns in Russia it is believed that the television
plays still the main role not the tools of microsurgery on the web, mainly territory of the opposition. Alexander Nix, head of the SCL Group, firm very close to
Cambridge Analytica, denied any ties to Moscow. However, the New York Times has
obtained SCL promotional materials where Russia is on the map of the countries
where the group works. Christopher Wylie, the collaborator of Cambridge
Analytica who unveiled the machinations with user data, says he had a meeting
with the managers of Lukoil, the second Russian oil company, very close to the
government. According to the press offices of the stakeholders, Lukoil and SLC
were contacted twice, in Great Britain and Turkey, for several promotional
activities such as sponsorship of football teams. However, nothing ever
materialized. Wylie argues – and an anonymous source of the New York Times
confirms his version – that there has been talks of profiling American voters,
and that it seemed to him that the Russians were not interested in this kind of
project.
Hypotheses, allusions and conspiracies, but nothing certain. RT, the
international Russian TV of the Kremlin, stated that the Facebook scandal “will
soon be forgotten” and “not cause any damage to Donald Trump” because it
represents no interest in the American establishment: “it does not allow to
discredit Russia”, it is also said.
Translated and summarized by Giuseppe Loporchio
Source: La Stampa - Anna Zafesova
Translated and summarized by Giuseppe Loporchio
Source: La Stampa - Anna Zafesova
Comments
Post a Comment